This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers mailing list for the Cygwin project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 1/19/2012 20:38, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 19 12:21, Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 01/19/2012 12:19 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >>> >>> 1. is probably acceptable by gcc upstream. Googling around, >>> I find precedent in other compilers for something like that. >> >> Obviously, I meant 4., the pragma. > > Understood. What I mean with "upstream" here is not gcc, though. > > Upstream is the Mingw64 project in the first place. Is it acceptable > for Mingw64 to adapt the Windows header files to a LP64 compiler? And > if so, which solution is preferred? > > > Corinna > Please keep Kai in the CC, thanks.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |