This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Cygwin Filesystem Performance degradation 1.7.5 vs 1.7.7, and methods for improving performance
On Sep 30 16:13, Derry Shribman wrote:
> Beyond that: it has already been tested: many people mount with
> ihash (which means no ino/nlink), and nearly all the applications
> work without any problem.
How do you know that? This option has never been discussed on the
Cygwin ML and the ihash option is new since 1.7.6, and it has been
documented to workaround broken file systems, not as an all-purpose
performance mount option, which it isn't.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
- References:
- Re: Cygwin Filesystem Performance degradation 1.7.5 vs 1.7.7, and methods for improving performance
- Re: Cygwin Filesystem Performance degradation 1.7.5 vs 1.7.7, and methods for improving performance
- Re: Cygwin Filesystem Performance degradation 1.7.5 vs 1.7.7, and methods for improving performance
- From: Larry Hall \(Cygwin Developers\)
- Re: Cygwin Filesystem Performance degradation 1.7.5 vs 1.7.7, and methods for improving performance
- Re: Cygwin Filesystem Performance degradation 1.7.5 vs 1.7.7, and methods for improving performance
- From: Larry Hall \(Cygwin Developers\)
- Re: Cygwin Filesystem Performance degradation 1.7.5 vs 1.7.7, and methods for improving performance
- Re: Cygwin Filesystem Performance degradation 1.7.5 vs 1.7.7, and methods for improving performance
- From: Larry Hall \(Cygwin Developers\)
- Re: Cygwin Filesystem Performance degradation 1.7.5 vs 1.7.7, and methods for improving performance
- Re: Cygwin Filesystem Performance degradation 1.7.5 vs 1.7.7, and methods for improving performance
- Re: Cygwin Filesystem Performance degradation 1.7.5 vs 1.7.7, and methods for improving performance