This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Fwd: dlopen regression in 1.7? (or is it just me?)]

From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
Cc: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:22:17 +0100
Subject: Re: [Fwd: dlopen regression in 1.7? (or is it just me?)]
References: <20090811180200.GJ3204@calimero.vinschen.de> <20090811182134.GK3204@calimero.vinschen.de> <4A821779.4000306@gmail.com> <20090812073634.GL3204@calimero.vinschen.de> <20090812084746.GM3204@calimero.vinschen.de> <20090812150204.GA23876@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4A82DD22.1060606@gmail.com>

Dave Korn wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:47:46AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>> I think the second !_dynamically_loaded is redundant isn't it?
> 
>   This whole patch is obviated by the technique of not updating the pointer, but
> copying back the entire struct wholesale.

  Erp.  No it isn't.  Pardon me.

    cheers,
      DaveK

References:
- [Fwd: dlopen regression in 1.7? (or is it just me?)]
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: [Fwd: dlopen regression in 1.7? (or is it just me?)]
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: [Fwd: dlopen regression in 1.7? (or is it just me?)]
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: [Fwd: dlopen regression in 1.7? (or is it just me?)]
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: [Fwd: dlopen regression in 1.7? (or is it just me?)]
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: [Fwd: dlopen regression in 1.7? (or is it just me?)]
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: [Fwd: dlopen regression in 1.7? (or is it just me?)]
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]