This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: upset vs. genini, release-2 hint files [Was: Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty]
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:00:47 -0400
- Subject: Re: upset vs. genini, release-2 hint files [Was: Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty]
- References: <1243532302.19957.1317676625@webmail.messagingengine.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:38:22PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>#1) should upset also be made strict (which would mean a massive audit
>of release-2 setup.hint files, and perhaps also an audit of the actual
>.tar.bz2 files under release-2)
No, upset specifically doesn't care if source files are missing.
>#2) OR, should genini be made more lax, like upset?
Why not add an option?
cgf