This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: key64_t? ino64_t?

From: Robert Collins <rbcollins at cygwin dot com>
To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
Date: 14 May 2003 19:11:35 +1000
Subject: Re: key64_t? ino64_t?
Organization:
References: <20030511035035.73D475C400@smtp.us2.messagingengine.com> <1052626034.907.67.camel@localhost> <20030514063644.A48805D6AD@smtp.us2.messagingengine.com> <20030514083954.GG19367@cygbert.vinschen.de>

On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 18:39, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> Since ftok wasn't exported at all, I'm voting for
> just using the new implementation.

Agreed.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

References:
- Re: key64_t? ino64_t?
  - From: Charles Wilson
- Re: key64_t? ino64_t?
  - From: Robert Collins
- Re: key64_t? ino64_t?
  - From: Charles Wilson
- Re: key64_t? ino64_t?
  - From: Corinna Vinschen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]