This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: key64_t? ino64_t?


cgf@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 07:40:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

This is important to decide and to code ASAP, to get out 1.5.0 finally.

Do we want a 64 bit key_t in Cygwin? Yes? No? Who will do the changes?


I'd say yes. The changes should be trivial compared to ino_t.


Do we want a 64 bit ino_t in Cygwin?  Yes?  No?  Who will do the changes?
(Probably me in this case).


Did you see my email to cygwin? I said I had most of the changes done, AFAICT.


I'm buried in a 2 month backlog of mails from the mainlist, which thread is this discussed in? Thanks...


Cheers,
Nicholas


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]