This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: -fno-rtti
"Conrad Scott" <Conrad.Scott@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> Would the alternative of compiling just the cygserver with rtti
be
> acceptable? For the problem I've got (which is defining
equality
> operators on a class hierarchy) rolling my own code would
probably
> cost more in terms of space and time than the native C++ rtti.
I've found a way of doing this w/o dynamic_cast (and w/o being too
extremely horrible either), so I'll change over to that and avoid
the issue. As you said in your reply "I'd rather not make a
conscious decision to do this when it can be avoided." I'll go
with that :-)
// Conrad