Re: Setup.exe 2.78.2.2 test satisfactory

["Trevor Forbes" <trevorforbes at ozemail dot com dot au>]

Sorry, I spoke too soon, when I did a further net tests, I still see
incorrect package choices in the experimental.

For example using bash with "view full"
previous  2.05-6  ->  2.05-5
current    2.05-6  ->  keep
Exp        2.05-6  ->  2.05-4

Note "expermental" is picking up a earler package before "previous"

At least the uninstalls have gone.....

Regards Trevor


----- Original Message -----
From: "Trevor Forbes" <trevorforbes@ozemail.com.au>
To: <cygwin-developers@cygwin.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: Setup.exe 2.78.2.2 test satisfactory


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com>
> To: <cygwin-developers@cygwin.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Setup.exe 2.78.2.2 test satisfactory
>
>
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:22:01PM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
> > >From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com>
> > >> Anyone else tried this?
> > >
> > >
> > >Yes, but the last time I reported setup was good, all hell broke loose
> when
> > >it was released.....;)
> > >
> > >This one, however, has some bugs...if you select experimental then
> > >"view - full", the "new" column is full of uninstalls and some
incorrect
> > >versions.  "view - partial" the same.....
> >
> > This is a pretty serious bug.  I understand the uninstall.  I don't
> understand
> > the "incorrect version".  What is wrong with the version?
> >
> > cgf
>
> Sorry, for not being so clear..... The incorrect version I was referring
to
> was that some items were reverting to previous versions.  However, your
> fixed version has corrected the bugs I reported and works fine on the
basic
> tests I did...
> Darn ...I just noticed you have made more changes....
>
> Good work to all involved....
>
> The delayed response is because I live in central Australia......
>
> Regards Trevor
>
>
>