This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [Fwd: [MinGW-dvlpr] Lobbying for w32 patches to gcc, binutils]
- To: Earnie Boyd <cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com>
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: [MinGW-dvlpr] Lobbying for w32 patches to gcc, binutils]
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:00:43 -0500
- Cc: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- References: <3A9BD859.1E2FB124@yahoo.com> <20010227123603.A11566@redhat.com>
- Reply-To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 12:36:03PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I missed (or don't remember) either of these.
>
>Does anyone of the URLs for these patches?
>
>DJ can make binutils changes. The GCC changes will probably require the
>approval of one of the maintainers unless they are local to cygwin-specific
>files, in which case, DJ or I can apply them.
Doh. I actually had applied the stdcall patch to gcc 2.95.2-8. The URL is:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-01/msg01751.html
I found the binutils patch, too. It looks interesting but not
crucial:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-02/msg00232.html
The gcc poster says that he didn't know if the stdcall problem was fixed
in the current gcc trunk. Does anyone know the status of this change?
cgf