Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0

[Ivan Shynkarenka <chronoxor at gmail dot com>]

 > There is no need for anybody else to look for mail addresses that may or
may not be actively monitored.
> The general rule is to not mail package maintainers directly and IMHO
that's the right idea.

Thanks a lot for the information! I'm new in Cygwin contribution world, but
I want to help.
So lets wait a little bit, maybe some one of cmake maintainers will help to
update the package.

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:49 PM, Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> wrote:

> cyg Simple writes:
> > Egads, Ivan wants to help and you give him a run around without doing a
> > little research.
>
> No, all I'm saying that there's a protocol for that.  The maintainer is
> supposed to monitor this list, if he doesn't, the package might be up
> for grabs after a final ping from the project leads.  There is no need
> for anybody else to look for mail addresses that may or may not be
> actively monitored.  The general rule is to not mail package maintainers
> directly and IMHO that's the right idea.
>
>
> Regards,
> Achim.
> --
> +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
>
> SD adaptation for Waldorf Blofeld V1.15B11:
> http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada
>