This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: cygfuse (was Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8)
- From: Adrien JUND <liryna dot stark at gmail dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:12:50 +0200
- Subject: Re: cygfuse (was Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <D3BF7FAD.A9C3%billziss@navimatics.com> <579A4102.9040406@maxrnd.com> <D3BFA5AD.AA0D%billziss@navimatics.com> <20160728200435.GG26311@calimero.vinschen.de> <D3BFC46B.AA41%billziss@navimatics.com> <20160729085141.GK26311@calimero.vinschen.de> <20160817091433.zksukafls6mkk52u@calimero.vinschen.de> <Pine.BSF.4.63.1608220229040.94028@m0.truegem.net> <D3E48B5F.AE86%billziss@navimatics.com> <57CD3C7A.1000902@maxrnd.com> <CAFUnBZi6Rsabd=KMPtifb7V42PAnU4aL+QoqG0rXw_X6im1KZw@mail.gmail.com> <57CF3E21.3060901@maxrnd.com> <57D11B39.2010108@maxrnd.com> <D406F19F.B3EF%billziss@navimatics.com>
>Other than that I would think that the package would be ready for
>submission. Any changes to support additional projects like Dokany, etc.
>could easily happen in the future when those projects are ready.
Currently it is the package that is not ready for other additional projects.
I saw that Mark already began to make some changes,
I now have more time for this and will give a head to see how this
could be made and come back with ideas of a main interface.
2016-09-20 23:12 GMT+02:00 Bill Zissimopoulos <billziss@navimatics.com>:
> On 9/8/16, 1:03 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
>
>
>>I've changed Subject: to reflect what's being discussed now. When we
>>have a
>>consensus cygfuse I'll issue an ITP for it.
>>
>>I've now updated the cygfuse repository on GitHub so it is more neutral
>>about
>>FUSE implementations. It can be seen at
>>https://github.com/mgeisert/cygfuse .
>>
>>I've also read up a little on Dokan and Dokany, so I should be able to
>>better
>>respond to any comments Adrien might have about the updated cygfuse.
>
> Mark, has there been any additional progress on this?
>
> Looking at the updated cygfuse I believe one change would be to rename
> cygfuse.pc back to fuse.pc so that build configuration scripts can find
> it. I have created a github issue for this.
>
> Other than that I would think that the package would be ready for
> submission. Any changes to support additional projects like Dokany, etc.
> could easily happen in the future when those projects are ready.
>
> Bill
>