Question about clisp version naming

[Jon TURNEY]

On 17/03/2015 22:40, Ken Brown wrote:
> Yes.  But that makes me wonder if I made things too complicated and
> could have avoided building lisp.dll.  The native Windows build of clisp
> creates a lisp.def file, containing the symbols of lisp.exe, and it just
> adds "lisp.def" to the gcc command line when building the modules.  But
> that didn't work on Cygwin; the linker complained that it didn't know
> what lisp.def was, and it tried to interpret it as a linker script.  Is
> there a way to make this approach work?

I seem to recall that you can't have any comments at the start of the 
module definition file for ld to recognize it as one.