Re: [ITP] znc 1.6.0

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>]

On Jul 22 00:32, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> > I've had a busy day and I'm a little tired, so I'm probably about to
> > make a fool of myself on a public mailing list. Never mind :-) Three
> > points on the znc package:
> > 
> >   - Unless I've missed something, all this talk of DLL naming is a
> > little academic at the moment, as there is no 'dll.a' file to actually
> > link against.
> 
> GCC links against .dll (or .so) fine.

Without the (non-versioned) .dll.a file in /usr/lib, using -lznc will
fail.  This should be part of the -devel package.

> >   - Has anyone tried building this in Cygwin? I tried rebuilding the
> > 1.6.0-2 release, and couldn't get it to compile without hacking the
> > 'Makefile.in' files. Even if you generate a 'dll.a', the linker
> > arguments are in the wrong order. This doesn't matter in Linux, but it
> > /does/ matter in Cygwin. Does this only build if cross-compiled out of
> > Fedora?
> 
> I'm using https://github.com/znc/znc-cygwin to build it on Cygwin.
> 
> >   - Forgive me for being pedantic, but who gave this a GTG? I couldn't
> > find one on this thread, and yet the package is up on the mirrors.
> 
> I thought if the package exists in popular distros, no GTG needed?

Uhm, no.  The *votes* are not required, the GTG is.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

Attachment: pgpBGlm4wDu3P.pgp
Description: PGP signature