This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [64bit] python3 vs. threads

From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz at users dot sourceforge dot net>
To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:48:46 -0500
Subject: Re: [64bit] python3 vs. threads
References: <51AD6D64 dot 6040502 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <51F84436 dot 9090106 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <51F86DF7 dot 4060807 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <52048066 dot 5040400 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <20130815153207 dot GY4315 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <520D14E9 dot 5080908 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <20130815182303 dot GA4315 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>

On 2013-08-15 13:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

On Aug 15 12:50, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:

I NMU'd both python and python3 for x86_64 earlier this week as a
prerequisite for the GNOME 3.8 update; so far they're both working
well.


That sounds good, basically, but what means "NMU'd? :}

"Non-maintainer upload" (Debian lingo, I'm not aware of a similar termin Fedora-land).



Yaakov

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [64bit] python3 vs. threads
  - From: Corinna Vinschen

References:
- Re: [64bit] python3 vs. threads
  - From: Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
- Re: [64bit] python3 vs. threads
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: [64bit] python3 vs. threads
  - From: Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
- Re: [64bit] python3 vs. threads
  - From: Corinna Vinschen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]