This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?

From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz at users dot sourceforge dot net>
To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:36:35 -0500
Subject: Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
References: <51643F10 dot 7000905 at gmail dot com> <87eheixuz8 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <20130410154730 dot GA404 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <516599BE dot 7090000 at gmail dot com> <51661EA2 dot 1070801 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <51665212 dot 6050101 at gmail dot com> <51665F0F dot 8040902 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <20130411101342 dot GA12461 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <5166A928 dot 8030805 at gmail dot com> <20130411121925 dot GA24666 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <CAF1jjLtESKh6rcOoGsTr-Z=WBAF0Oncr459f3JpbxQKg2FGq7w at mail dot gmail dot com> <5166AE15 dot 6030402 at gmail dot com>

On 2013-04-11 07:35, Dave Korn wrote:

On 11/04/2013 13:22, NightStrike wrote:

Speaking of which......   4.8 is out.......

So is GNOME 3.8.0, but I tend to let others deal with the early bugs andcatch up by .1 or even .2.

   Point.  Anyone got any particular preference whether I go for a 4.7.3 or
4.8.0 release next?  Maybe do a 4.7.3 curr: and then a 4.8.0 test: package?

For the same reason, I'd go with 4.7.3 first. But let's not wait until4.9 to update GCC again this time, okay? :-)



Yaakov

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: Dave Korn

References:
- GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: Achim Gratz
- Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
- Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
- Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]