This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: ITP: googlecl-0.9.7


On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 06:06:05PM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>On 23 June 2010 21:44, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:35:34PM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>>>On 23 June 2010 15:45, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>>> Same issue as python-gdata; use this instead:
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>Thank you again for the cygport hint. ?I've uploaded a new release
>>>based on the revised cygport:
>>>
>>>---
>>>
>>>wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=3 \
>>>http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/googlecl/googlecl-0.9.7-1.tar.bz2 \
>>>http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/googlecl/googlecl-0.9.7-1-src.tar.bz2 \
>>>http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/googlecl/setup.hint
>>>
>>>---
>>>
>>>>> It looks like googlecl hasn't made it into any major Linux distro yet,
>>>>> so I guess it's going to need to be voted on.
>>>>
>>>> FWIW it was just added this week to Fedora:
>>>>
>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/googlecl
>>>
>>>Excellent! ?I assume then that this package does not need to be voted on?
>>
>> Not if it's actually in Fedora, no.
>
>It looks like it's been approved by the Fedora project, but not yet
>part of the official distro:
>
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/googlecl?_csrf_token=879babc67802f2680669bc5e84da7be1c5bf2632
>
>So is this package good to go, or does it need to be voted on?

If it is not officially in a distribution then it needs to be
voted on.

+1

cgf


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]