Re: [RFU 1.5 and 1.7] libaprutil1-1.3.7

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>]

On Jul  1 13:47, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 7/1/2009 12:24 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jul  1 09:49, David Rothenberger wrote:
>>> On 7/1/2009 3:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> On Jun 30 09:02, David Rothenberger wrote:
>>>>> On 6/30/2009 1:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>>>> Here, the aprutil1 package still exists in the 1.7 release area, but
>>>>>> I don't think it makes sense anymore, along the same lines as for
>>>>>> libapr1.  I think it should be ok to remove it from the 1.7 release.
>>>>>> What do you say?
>>>>> The aprutil1 and apr1 packages are just transition packages to 
>>>>> help   people upgrade from the old package naming schema to the 
>>>>> new one. They  don't need to be in the 1.7 area if we believe 
>>>>> everyone will have  updated their apr1 and aprutil1 packages 
>>>>> before they try to upgrade to  1.7. I'm not sure that's true, 
>>>>> though. It seems there are at least some  people that only update 
>>>>> once every 3-5 years. :-)
>>>> So you'd rather have the apr1 package in the 1.7 release as well?
>>> I don't know the right answer.
>>
>> What I was trying to say is this:  It's your choice.
>
> Okay, then yes, I'd like to have the apr1 and aprutil1 packages in the  
> 1.7 release area.

Ok, I added the apr1 package to 1.7.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat