[HEADSUP] Let's start a Cygwin 1.7 release area

[Reini Urban]

2008/4/15, Corinna Vinschen:
> On Apr 15 10:17, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>  > I also object to using "Red Hat" as the "owner" [...]
>
>  Red Hat *is* the owner of the code, regardless of the registry key you
>  want to use.  I know that you have mixed feelings about Red Hat,
>  however, assuming the code is owned by the FSF, would you object against
>  a parent key name of FSF as well?

Cannot we just use just "Cygwin" as the most obvious choice.
We really don't have to use some artificial company name.
-- 
Reini