This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: rebasing new packages?!

From: Jason Tishler <jason at tishler dot net>
To: Robert Collins <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
Cc: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 10:56:30 -0400
Subject: Re: rebasing new packages?!
References: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5FAE@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>

Rob,

On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 09:37:48AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@tishler.net] 
> > Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 3:34 AM
> > 
> > Can we remove the "-Werror" option and start using STL in setup.exe?
> 
> [snip]
>
> Perhaps removing the explicit inline from the definition is appropriate?

Bingo.  That fixed the problem.  Sorry, for being sloppy.

Should I send the attached patch to the Cygwin gcc maintainer?

> (-O3 will automatically inline it, and probably get that warning again,
> but casual users would be safe.

I tried the "-O3" option and the warning did *not* occur.

If the attached patch is accepted, can I start using STL in setup.exe
now?

Thanks,
Jason

Attachment: stl_tree.h.diff
Description: Text document

References:
- RE: rebasing new packages?!
  - From: Robert Collins

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]