RE: new cygwin package: cgoban

["Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>]

Get a new setup.exe from http://www.cygwin.com/setup.exe.

Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teun Burgers [mailto:a.rburgers@freeler.nl] 
> Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 5:46 PM
> To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: new cygwin package: cgoban
> 
> 
> I see the original message has led
> to quite some discussion and even a decree.
> 
> What is the status on the upload?
> My setup.exe seems to crash on an increasing
> number of mirrors right after download
> of setup.ini. This is the message:
> 
>    SETUP heeft een algemene beschermingsfout veroorzaakt 
>    in module USER.EXE op 0004:00005ff0.
> 
>    (dutch for general protecting fault).
> 
> Charles Wilson wrote:
> 
> > Similarly, I don't like the restriction that all 'X'-based 
> packages go
> > under XFree86/ on sourceware.  We don't put inetutils underneath 
> > ncurses/.  We don't put openssh under openssl/.
> 
> And:
> 
> > Further, if one accepts that there should be one tree for all X
> > **clients**, you've never stated WHY that single tree must 
> be the same 
> > one used by the XFree86 packages. They aren't PART of 
> XFree86.  They 
> > just USE XFree86.
> 
> I couldn't agree more. Putting them under XFree86 strongly 
> suggests that the package would be part of XFree86, and that 
> is not the case.
> 
> Teun Burgers
>