This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
- From: "Morrison, John" <John dot Morrison at uk dot experian dot com>
- To: 'Robert Collins' <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>, "Morrison, John" <John dot Morrison at uk dot experian dot com>, cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Cc: ian at caliban dot org
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:50:03 -0000
- Subject: RE: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Question: does experimental == test?
If it does then we shouldn't refer to things as experimental but as being
'in test'. If not then should the test: line in setup.hint be changed to
experimental: ? I know it's more typing but...
J.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:robert.collins@itdomain.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2001 11:10 am
> To: Morrison, John; cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
> Cc: ian@caliban.org
> Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
>
>
>
> ===
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Morrison, John" <John.Morrison@uk.experian.com>
> To: <cygwin-apps@cygwin.com>
> Cc: <ian@caliban.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:02 PM
> Subject: RE: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
>
>
> > I found a problem with the bash_completion as stands...
> >
> ...
> >
> > Sorry to have caused so much hassle just to retract it :(
>
> I wouldn't worry - this is the whole point of having new
> packages start
> out as 'experimental'. It allows some breathing room.
>
> Rob
>
=======================================================================
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission. There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.
Experian Limited (registration number 653331).
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF