Re: RFC: Merge native-struct into gcc 3.1

[Danny Smith <danny_r_smith_2001 at yahoo dot co dot nz>]

 --- Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> wrote: > Did this ever go
anywhere, Danny?
> 

No.  I've not received any feedback from Donn (except the usual "busy"
tone) or anyone else till now.  Specifically Donn was going to confirm or
deny the union-alignment issue.  My head is also emitting a lot of busy
tones lately too.

> Isn't 3.1 going to be frozen RSN?
> 
There's always 3.2.  Seriously, I have given priority to the fastcall work.
Yesterday I  uploaded a beta of gcc-2.95.3 and binutils for mingw (to SF
file release page) with the fastcall support in. Here, with diffs and all
if your interested:

https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2435

I am waiting for some feedback on that (too).  Eric gives me another busy
tone, but I am bugging him relentlessly. I think the fastcall patches will
be easier since they are not so intrusive into generic code as the 
native-struct business. (Donn's already had two goes at gcc-patches) 

buzzz--buzzz--buzzz--
Danny



http://briefcase.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Briefcase
- Manage your files online.