This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

To: "edward" <tailbert at Yahoo dot com>,<cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 02:01:31 +1100
Cc: <automake at gnu dot org>
References: <022b01c0a86a$d09a8080$9865fea9@edward> <002801c0a94a$e8e80e10$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <038f01c0a96b$0b2bf980$9865fea9@edward>

Thanks edward,
    when I started looking into those, I read somewhere in the automake
pages, that the XFAIL results, are "expected fails", so only the

FAIL: pr87.test
FAIL: subdirbuiltsources.test

Still need to be looked at. Sorry for the slight misdirection.

Rob


----- Original Message -----
From: "edward" <tailbert@Yahoo.com>
To: <cygwin-apps@cygwin.com>
Cc: <automake@gnu.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates


>
SNIP> > and had the following tests fail:
> > XFAIL: cond3.test
>
> cond3.test fails for three reasons.
>
<SNIP>
> > FAIL: pr19.test
>
> pr19.test fails for two reasons.
>
<SNIP>
>
> > FAIL: pr87.test
> > FAIL: subdirbuiltsources.test
> > XFAIL: yaccvpath.test
>
> I haven't looked at those yet.
>

Follow-Ups:
- automake updates (was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates)
  - From: edward
- Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
  - From: Robert Collins

References:
- ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
  - From: edward
- Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
  - From: Robert Collins
- Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
  - From: edward

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]